Kaan · Article
2025-11-19
Learning My Way Through Ad Spend
A small list of 50 perfect users is almost useless for direct targeting. The unlock is modeling from a list, not targeting a list.

Learning my way through adspend...
I've been going down a rabbit hole trying to understand how to actually lower adspend on Google & Meta for B2C SaaS, beyond just tweaking bids.
My initial thought was that you just export your "power user" list and retarget them directly. You know, the ones who've activated, stuck around, and actually get value from the product.
But I'm learning that's not the main point. A small list of 50 perfect users is almost useless for direct targeting at scale.
Here's what I've pieced together:
Initial Dataset: The first step is to analyze that high LTV user list. Instead of just using all 50, the idea is to find the common threads. Profiling, clustering, treating it like cleaning a dataset with too much noise. You're trying to create a high signal "perfect user" sample. Maybe that list of 50 becomes a hyper focused list of 25 that represents your ideal user archetype.
Cleaned Data: You upload this tiny, focused list to Google (as Customer Match) or Meta (as a Custom Audience). Think of it as providing clean training data, not a blunt targeting filter.
The Audience: The platform's algorithms then analyze that seed. It finds hidden patterns across thousands of behavioral features and builds a new, massive audience of millions called a Similar Segment (Google) or Lookalike Audience (Meta). This new audience is now modeled after your proven best customers.
The big takeaway for me: You're not guessing with broad "Interest" tags anymore. You're giving the algorithms a high fidelity blueprint and telling it, "go find me more people exactly like this." It feels like the difference between writing brittle heuristics versus giving a model a well-labeled dataset to infer patterns from.
I'm still connecting the dots on this, but this shift from "targeting" a list to "modeling" from a list feels like the unlock.
Has anyone else found this to be true?